Revenue
AED 447.1m
- Period
- three months ended 2026-03-31
- Reporting scope
- CONSOLIDATED_GROUP
- Document and physical page
- d4af890e68ba#p1 · 2bebd5823415#p6
DFM · DEYAAR
Deyaar's business model, ownership, dated project stages, land and asset accounting, financial context, liquidity and official contacts.
Identity revalidation is due; this dated record is not proof of current listing status · 2026-08-11
As of: 2026-08-30
Deyaar Development (P.J.S.C), traded as DEYAAR on the Dubai Financial Market, combines property development with services that continue after a building is delivered: property and community management, facilities management, leasing and hospitality. The operating group is not interchangeable with its controlling shareholder, Dubai Islamic Bank. Buying the developer’s shares is not ownership of the bank’s wider asset portfolio.
The corporate website traces the business to 2002; the financial statements date incorporation as a public joint-stock company to 10 July 2007. These are different milestones, not competing founding dates. The latest interim report says operations are in the UAE. Dubai remains central, while the construction portfolio also includes Rivage in Abu Dhabi and AYA in Umm Al Quwain.
S2 · p. 10, 15 S8 · Diversified Business Units S4 · p. 11, 12As of: 2026-06-30
The company describes six business units, but its financial statements aggregate activities into three reporting segments. The distinction matters: service branding is not a financial segment, and the whole managed property portfolio is not necessarily owned by Deyaar. Property development includes both sales and certain leasing income. Property and facilities management combines fee-based activities with a separate leasing line; hospitality is reported separately.
For the first half of 2026, the largest revenue source remained property sales. Recognition of revenue is not synonymous with launches, signed sales or customer cash receipts: the accounts recognise revenue both over time and at a point in time. Our reading is that construction execution and collections must be assessed together. The management businesses broaden revenue sources, but the segment table shows that they do not remove the group’s dependence on development.
S2 · p. 14, 22, 23 S8 · Diversified Business Units S4 · p. 11, 12| Reporting segment | H1 2026 | H1 2025 | Official sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property development, including leasing | 821.876 | 782.619 | S2 · p. 14 |
| Property and facilities management | 87.995 | 83.111 | S2 · p. 14 |
| Hospitality | 42.707 | 59.699 | S2 · p. 14 |
As of: 2026-08-30; ownership 2025-12-31
Dubai Islamic Bank held 44.983% at 31 December 2025, according to the annual ownership disclosure. The June 2026 accounts identify it as the ultimate controlling shareholder. A holding below half of the shares is therefore not a reason to describe this relationship as merely a passive investment. Conversely, control does not mean the bank owns every share: public shareholders retain their separate economic interest in Deyaar.
The current IR page names Abdullah Al Hamli as chairman, Hamad Buamim as vice chairman, Saeed Al Qatami as chief executive and Bassam El Ghawi as chief financial officer. These are role disclosures checked on 30 August 2026, not assumptions about personal shareholdings. The controlling bank is also a lender and deposit counterparty, making related-party balances relevant to an assessment of funding concentration.
S3 · p. 48 S2 · p. 10, 20 S5 · Board of Directors; Management TeamAs of: 2025-12-31 with Al Zorah update 2026-05-01
The selected entities below explain the operating structure rather than reproduce the full legal register. The annual statements consolidate Rivage and Deyaar Umm Al Quwain Waterfront, despite different ownership percentages, while Arady is a joint venture. Consequently, neither project size nor an investee’s total assets should automatically be assigned in full to Deyaar’s shareholders. Non-controlling interests participate in the results of consolidated subsidiaries.
Al Zorah requires a current qualification. Deyaar retained its 22.72% interest, but from 1 May 2026 the revised governance rights no longer gave it significant influence. The holding moved from the equity method to fair value through other comprehensive income. This is a change in rights and accounting classification, not evidence that Deyaar sold the stake or acquired the underlying properties outright.
S1 · p. 19, 20, 46, 47, 54, 55 S2 · p. 27| Entity / interest | Effective ownership | Role and accounting perimeter | Official sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deyaar Facilities Management LLC | 100% | Consolidated facilities-management subsidiary | S1 · p. 20 |
| Deyaar Property Management LLC | 100% | Consolidated property-management subsidiary | S1 · p. 20 |
| Deyaar Community Management LLC | 100% | Consolidated owners-association management | S1 · p. 20 |
| Deyaar Hospitality LLC / The Atria L.L.C / Al Barsha LLC | 100% | Each is a consolidated subsidiary; property investment/development, hotel management and hotel/apartment rental respectively | S1 · p. 20 |
| Rivage Property Development LLC | 52% | Consolidated subsidiary; other shareholders participate in results | S1 · p. 20, 54 |
| Deyaar Umm Al Quwain Waterfront LLC | 50% | Consolidated subsidiary, not presented here as a wholly owned project | S1 · p. 20, 55 |
| Arady Developments LLC | 50% | Equity-accounted joint venture: development and leasing | S1 · p. 47 |
| Solidere International Al Zorah Equity Investments Inc | 22.72% | From 1 May 2026: retained investment at FVOCI after loss of significant influence | S2 · p. 27 |
As of: Q2 2026 construction update, checked 2026-08-30
The project map below uses the company’s construction update labelled Q2 2026, available through its current IR materials. It is a dated developer report, not an independent site inspection. Completion, statutory approval, buyer orientation and handover are separate steps. For example, Regalia and Jannat were welcoming residents, while Tria was still working through final completion formalities. A project marketed on the website should not therefore automatically be described as delivered.
The portfolio spans different execution stages. Park Five’s Elm, Ember and Neem had superstructure works underway; Ivy and Alder were moving beyond enabling works after main-contractor mobilisation. Rivage, AYA and DWTN extend the pipeline but remain construction commitments, not completed income-producing buildings. No new completion deadline is inferred from a description such as 'progressing' or 'imminent'.
S4 · p. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13| Project / location | Reported stage | Official sources |
|---|---|---|
| Jannat, Midtown — Dubai Production City | Completed with statutory approvals; handovers and resident move-ins underway | S4 · p. 2 |
| Regalia — Business Bay | Completed; customer handovers and first residents | S4 · p. 3 |
| Millennium Talia Residences — Al Furjan | Statutory approvals complete; orientation and handover phase | S4 · p. 4 |
| Tria — Dubai Silicon Oasis | Finishes, testing and commissioning; final completion formalities underway | S4 · p. 5 |
| Rosalia Residences — Al Furjan | Finishing works and final authority inspections | S4 · p. 6 |
| Mar Casa — Dubai Maritime City | Structure nearing completion; façade, services and finishing continue | S4 · p. 7 |
| Eleve — Downtown Jebel Ali | Tower structural works, basement and podium works ongoing | S4 · p. 8 |
| Park Five: Elm, Ember, Neem — Dubai Production City | Superstructure works; specialist procurement | S4 · p. 9 |
| Park Five: Ivy, Alder — Dubai Production City | Main contractor appointed and mobilised after enabling works | S4 · p. 10 |
| Rivage — Abu Dhabi | Main construction underway; cranes installed and raft reinforcement progressing | S4 · p. 11 |
| AYA Beachfront Residences — Umm Al Quwain | Shoring and services relocation complete; preparation for main works | S4 · p. 12 |
| DWTN Residences — Business Bay | Shoring preparation started; design and authority coordination continuing | S4 · p. 13 |
As of: 2026-06-30
Deyaar holds a mix of development inventory, investment properties and operating assets. At 30 June 2026, land held for future development and use had a reported carrying amount of AED 380 million; management was evaluating feasible development options. This is an accounting amount, not a valuation of all development rights, an area in square feet, or a forecast of future sales. The selected disclosures do not provide a reconciled parcel-by-parcel area and title register, so none is invented here.
Development inventory is measured at the lower of cost and estimated net realisable value. Investment property instead follows a fair-value model and includes retail, serviced apartments, parking and other buildings. The two categories cannot be added together and presented as a homogeneous land bank or a published NAV. Some land and completed property is mortgaged; serviced apartments and leased buildings also make legal title and operating use different questions.
S2 · p. 5, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21| Asset category | AED million | Basis | Official sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development and sale inventory | 1037.761 | Lower of cost and net realisable value; includes future land, construction and completed stock | S2 · p. 5, 17 |
| Future-development land, within inventory | 380 | Carrying amount; feasibility under evaluation, not additional to inventory | S2 · p. 18 |
| Investment properties | 956.349 | Fair value; includes rental and mixed-use property, not a land-area measure | S2 · p. 16 |
As of: FY2025 and H1 2026
The latest interim statements found on the official IR page cover the six months ended 30 June 2026. They are consolidated and reviewed, not audited annual accounts. The annual columns below cover full calendar years, whereas the interim columns cover six months; they are not interchangeable growth comparisons. The existing quarterly article remains a separate dated review.
The first-half accounts show higher revenue and lower direct and administrative/selling costs than the comparable period, but not uniform improvement across all activities. Hospitality revenue declined. Profit before tax, total after-tax profit and profit attributable to the parent’s owners are different measures; non-controlling interests explain part of the gap. The tax note includes a domestic minimum top-up tax charge, another reason not to equate pre-tax growth with growth in owners’ earnings.
Profit is also affected by valuation and investee accounting. In the interim period, the Al Zorah reclassification gain and investment-property valuation loss largely offset within net fair-value gains. These items are not property-sale cash receipts. For a permanent company profile, the useful lesson is to read operating performance, valuation movements and cash conversion separately rather than extend a single headline profit figure into a forecast.
S1 · p. 13 S2 · p. 3, 4, 6, 9, 26, 27| Metric, AED million | FY2025 | FY2024 | H1 2026 | H1 2025 | Official sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1972.114 | 1512.794 | 952.578 | 925.429 | S1 · p. 13 S2 · p. 6 |
| Profit before tax | 637.862 | 505.416 | 336.086 | 266.614 | S1 · p. 13 S2 · p. 6 |
| Group profit after tax | 602.205 | 473.918 | 298.296 | 248.563 | S1 · p. 13 S2 · p. 6 |
| Profit attributable to parent owners | 607.541 | 474.022 | 276.627 | 250.963 | S1 · p. 13 S2 · p. 6 |
As of: 2026-06-30
The headline cash balance is large relative to bank borrowings, but the use of funds matters. The cash note identifies AED 1624 million in escrow accounts, including project accounts available for construction payments. Another AED 168 million held for third parties is excluded from the group’s bank balances. Neither amount should be treated as discretionary cash available for shareholder distributions.
The Islamic facilities finance construction and working capital and are secured on property. The note describes quarterly repayments over two to six years from the reporting date, alongside a separately disclosed current portion. Lease liabilities and contracted construction commitments are additional categories, not synonyms for bank debt. We do not calculate freely available net cash from gross balances or turn the commitment figure into an assertion that payments are overdue.
For the six months ended 30 June 2026, net operating cash inflow was AED 307.808 million versus AED 246.343 million in the comparable half year. This is cash after working-capital movements and the disclosed operating payments, not EBITDA or profit. It gives a different period-specific picture from the earlier quarterly article: a weak quarter must not be carried forward as a statement about the whole half year. Equally, stronger half-year operating cash does not make project escrow freely distributable.
S2 · p. 9, 20, 21, 22, 23| Measure, AED million | 30 June 2026 | 31 December 2025 | Official sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and bank balances, net | 2312.139 | 2211.582 | S2 · p. 20 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2297.103 | 2096.546 | S2 · p. 20 |
| Borrowings | 371.860 | 403.841 | S2 · p. 21 |
| Current borrowings, included above | 65.057 | 60.000 | S2 · p. 21 |
| Lease liabilities, separate | 19.618 | 31.025 | S2 · p. 22 |
| Project-contract commitments | 1469.6 | 1284.9 | S2 · p. 23 |
As of: 2026-06-30
The annual entity list records Deyaar Umm Al Quwain Waterfront as a newly included subsidiary with 50% effective ownership in 2025. The ownership and accounting treatment should be retained when discussing geographic expansion: a partnership project is not automatically a wholly owned development. The later Al Zorah change is a separate governance event, not the same transaction.
The interim accounts confirm that the dividend approved on 8 April 2026 was paid during the period: 5 fils per ordinary share, approximately AED 218.8 million in total. This describes a completed distribution, not a forecast yield, an annual entitlement or a promise that the next dividend will be identical. Future distributions depend on results, funding needs and corporate approvals.
S1 · p. 20, 55 S2 · p. 20, 27As of: 2026-08-03
In the latest results announcement, management emphasised completing existing commitments, sequencing the pipeline and protecting balance-sheet strength. These are company priorities, not an earnings guarantee. Our interpretation is that the next operating test is whether late-stage projects convert into completed handovers while newer developments progress without weakening collections or creating an avoidable funding squeeze.
Risks are specific to this operating model: timing of permits and construction, contractor costs, customer collections, tourism demand and property valuations. The group’s interim risk discussion also monitors regional geopolitical uncertainty. The lower hospitality revenue shows why service and hotel exposure should not be described as risk-free recurring income. Related-party funding concentration and the accessibility of escrow balances deserve continuing attention alongside headline profit.
S7 · CEO commentary S2 · p. 13, 14, 17, 23DFM · DEYAAR
Deyaar Development PJSC’s first-quarter 2026 results tell a mixed story. Revenue increased, lower expenses supported profit before tax and the cash balance grew. Yet profit attributable to owners of the parent was almost unchanged, while operations generated much less cash than a year earlier. The central question is therefore not simply how much profit the group reported, but how that profit was allocated, how it translated into cash and how available that cash is for financing projects.
Prepared on 2026-08-30 using the financial statements for the three months ended 2026-03-31. More recent statements were not checked; this reviews the specified period, not the company’s current position. The document’s original publication date was not established for this article. The editor checked the passages and rows used, not the entire report.
Reading time: 7 min
| Metric, AED million | Period / date | Value | Comparative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 447.084 | 433.427 |
| Direct costs | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 286.705 | 300.466 |
| Profit before tax | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 147.744 | 119.818 |
| Income tax expense | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 17.587 | 8.296 |
| Group profit after tax | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 130.157 | 111.522 |
| Profit attributable to owners of the parent | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 112.946 | 113.027 |
| Non-controlling interests’ result | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 17.211 | -1.505 |
| Operating cash flow | Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 | 12.384 | 76.434 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2026-03-31 / 2025-12-31 | 2360.940 | 2096.546 |
| Borrowings | 2026-03-31 / 2025-12-31 | 535.751 | 403.841 |
| Project-contract commitments | 2026-03-31 / 2025-12-31 | 1449.7 | 1284.9 |
This review covers 2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31, not the company’s current position at publication. Revenue, profit and cash-flow measures are compared with the same three months of 2025. Cash balances, borrowings and project-contract commitments are compared with 2025-12-31. These comparison bases differ: a quarterly flow cannot be directly compared with a balance at a reporting date. The source is the interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the company and its subsidiaries, subject to a review rather than a full annual audit. More recent financial statements were not checked for this article.
Group revenue reached AED 447.084 million, against AED 433.427 million a year earlier. Property sales remained the largest revenue line in the note, at AED 359.060 million versus AED 344.795 million. Hospitality, however, contributed AED 30.710 million versus AED 35.517 million. The increase in the group total should therefore not be described as uniform improvement across every activity: business lines moved differently. The cost combination had a stronger effect on earnings than revenue alone. Direct costs declined to AED 286.705 million from AED 300.466 million, while general, administrative and selling expenses fell to AED 45.340 million from AED 49.656 million. Within direct costs, the cost of property sales was AED 250.478 million versus AED 262.107 million. Arithmetically, this supports a wider gap between revenue and direct costs. It does not, on its own, prove higher selling prices or a lasting efficiency gain: that would require more detail about project mix and expense recognition. Not every earnings component supported growth. The share of results from a joint venture and an associate declined to AED 21.745 million from AED 27.535 million. The net investment-property valuation loss increased to AED 3.708 million from AED 2.049 million. Profit before tax ultimately reached AED 147.744 million versus AED 119.818 million. Our reading is that the revenue-and-cost combination improved, but this quarter’s cost structure cannot automatically be carried forward to the full year.
Income tax expense increased to AED 17.587 million from AED 8.296 million. Group profit after tax was AED 130.157 million, compared with AED 111.522 million. That is a positive group-level comparison, but profit attributable to owners of the parent was AED 112.946 million versus AED 113.027 million: almost unchanged, with a small decline. The distinction lies in allocation. Non-controlling interests accounted for a profit of AED 17.211 million, against a loss of AED 1.505 million in the comparative quarter. Total group profit must not be confused with the part attributable to the parent’s owners. This is not a valuation of the shares; it is an important distinction within the financial statements. Growth in profit before tax does not mean equivalent growth in earnings attributable to Deyaar’s owners. This review does not establish the subsidiary-specific reasons for the change in non-controlling interests’ results.
Net cash generated from operating activities was AED 12.384 million, against AED 76.434 million a year earlier. Operating cash flow before working-capital movements, however, increased to AED 135.600 million from AED 104.556 million. An important difference therefore arises through working capital and subsequent payments, rather than being explained by the profit figure alone. The cash-flow statement shows a negative AED 90.281 million contribution from movements in customer advances and a negative AED 72.569 million contribution from trade and other payables. These explain a substantial part of the pressure on operating cash flow. A negative movement in advances is not automatically evidence of falling new sales: the note defines advances as payments received for properties for which revenue has not yet been recognised. The balance changes not only with cash receipts but also as obligations are performed. For a developer, such a quarterly gap is not by itself proof of financial distress. Equally, higher reported earnings alone do not establish improved earnings quality. The useful next test is a recovery in operating inflows and an explanation of advances and project settlements, not simply multiplying one quarter’s profit into an annual figure.
Cash and cash equivalents reached AED 2360.940 million at 2026-03-31, compared with AED 2096.546 million at the end of 2025. During the quarter, the group drew AED 145.410 million of borrowings and repaid AED 13.500 million. The net movement in deposits with an original maturity exceeding three months generated an inflow of AED 95.000 million. The increase in cash equivalents therefore cannot be attributed entirely to operating performance. The cash note reports AED 1937.7 million in escrow accounts. These include project escrow accounts available for construction payments. The money belongs within the group’s reported balances, but its purpose matters when assessing liquidity. Our interpretation is that subtracting all borrowings from the headline cash balance is no substitute for analysing freely available funds. We do not calculate freely available net cash, because this review does not reconcile all restrictions into such a measure.
Borrowings under Islamic financing increased to AED 535.751 million from AED 403.841 million at 2025-12-31. The company explains that these facilities finance properties under construction and working capital, and are secured by property mortgages. This borrowing line is not the group’s total liabilities: lease liabilities, for example, are disclosed separately. Commitments on project contracts issued, net of invoices received and accruals, reached AED 1449.7 million, against AED 1284.9 million at year-end. These commitments are not the same as recognised bank borrowings, so combining the two without explanation would be misleading. They nevertheless show why access to funds and project execution schedules matter alongside profit. The evidence does not justify calling these commitments overdue or predicting an equity funding requirement. The cautious conclusion is simply that project funding needs must be considered against funds available for the relevant purposes.
First, property-sales revenue and its associated cost: whether the relationship continues to improve and whether the project-mix contribution is explained. Second, owners-attributable profit separately from total after-tax profit and non-controlling interests. Third, operating cash flow alongside customer advances and payables, which help explain cash conversion. Fourth, borrowings, escrow balances and project-contract commitments measured at consistent dates. These are measurable areas to monitor, not forecasts of future figures or promises about reporting dates.
Deyaar ended Q1 2026 with higher profit before tax, supported by revenue growth and lower expenses in several lines. For the parent’s owners, however, the quarter was much closer to the prior-year outcome than the group total suggests. The cash picture also requires a distinction between operating inflows, new borrowing and money held in project accounts. The report supports recognising improvements in parts of the result, but not declaring a sustained acceleration in the business or an increase in freely available liquidity proven. Subsequent assessment should use comparable disclosures on cash flow, profit allocation and project finance. This review offers neither a cheapness assessment nor a share-price target.
d4af890e68ba#p1–p2 · 2bebd5823415#p3,p5–p6 · 75bb985b0401#p3–p4
Open the official DFM-hosted disclosure ↗AED 447.1m
AED 433.4m
AED 147.7m
AED 119.8m
AED 8,151.5m
AED 7,269.2m
AED 112946 thousand
Reviewed interim condensed consolidated financial statements; not audited.
Official Q1 2026 financial statements1,425 · 3 projects
23.3%
Deyaar builds and sells residential and mixed-use projects in Dubai, and around that core it manages property, facilities and owner associations, leases space and operates hotels. The weighting is lopsided. In FY2025 development produced AED1,662.626m of revenue and AED535.865m of segment profit against group revenue of AED1,972.114m and profit after tax of AED602.205m. Management fees added AED193.590m of revenue for AED20.272m of profit; hospitality added AED115.898m for AED46.068m. In H1 2026 hospitality revenue and segment profit fell 28.5% and 42.8% year on year, while group revenue, profit and operating cash flow were AED952.578m, AED298.296m and AED307.808m.
The FY2025 investor presentation lists 16 projects, 6,258 units and AED9,808.7m of stated total sales value, spanning Park Five phases, DWTN Residences, AYA Umm Al Quwain, Rivage, Eleve, Mar Casa, Rosalia, Regalia, Tria, Jannat, Talia and Amalia. The schedule mixes completed, handover-stage, under- construction and early-stage assets, and it is management material rather than audited presales. The audited counterpart, IFRS 15 remaining performance obligations on property sales, fell from AED1,740.571m in FY2024 to AED1,230.471m in FY2025 and excludes obligations originally expected to run a year or less. At H1 2026 project commitments were AED1,469.6m and RERA guarantees AED475.8m.
Cash and bank balances were AED2,312.139m at H1 2026, of which AED1,624m — 70.2% — was development project escrow. Community-management fiduciary escrow is held for third parties and stays outside group cash. Borrowings were AED371.860m and leases AED19.618m against equity of AED5,729.066m and assets of AED7,979.018m. FY2025 operating cash flow of AED726.899m equalled 1.21 times group profit, but the bridge contained AED364.892m from customer advances, AED403.290m from payables and a AED559.790m receivable outflow, with AED81.017m of receivable impairment expense.
Dubai Islamic Bank held 1,968,368,538 shares, or 44.983%, and is named by the issuer as ultimate controlling party. It is also the lender and the deposit-taker: FY2025 finance cost to DIB was AED29.812m on AED24.219m drawn and AED60.773m repaid, DIB borrowings closed the year at AED388.2m, and AED575.8m of bank balances plus AED160m of fixed deposits sat with the same bank. Foreign nationality holdings were 12.13%, which is not foreign ownership headroom.
Gross and net presales, cancellation rates, collection rates, project-level margins, the escrow release schedule, land-bank acquisition economics, hotel occupancy, average daily rate and RevPAR, and parent-only unrestricted cash are all absent. So is the FY2025 audit and non-audit fee split. No price, no fair value and no trading view is offered on this page.
As of: 2026-08-30
Use the investor-relations channel for shareholder questions and the general corporate contacts for customer or business enquiries. The head-office location below is the company’s published location, while the postal box is its registered address in the accounts. These contacts were checked on the official website; no private mobile numbers or inferred employee email addresses are included.
S5 · Investor Relations contact S6 · Contact Us S2 · p. 10| Purpose | Official channel | Official sources |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate website | https://www.deyaar.ae/en/ | S8 · About Us |
| Investor Relations | https://www.deyaar.ae/en/investor-relations/ | S5 · Investor Relations |
| Investor questions | ir@deyaar.ae · +971 4 384 0909 | S5 · Investor Relations contact |
| General enquiries | CONTACTUS@DEYAAR.AE · 800-DEYAAR (339227) · +971 4 3840950 | S6 · Contact Us |
| Head office | Al Barsha, Dubai · +971 4 3957700 | S6 · UAE Offices |
| Registered postal address | P.O. Box 30833, Dubai, UAE | S2 · p. 10 |
As of: 2026-08-30
This profile was prepared on 30 August 2026. Financial data are dated to the reporting period, ownership to its disclosed date and project stages to the construction update; they do not all describe the same day. The narrative is original editorial analysis of selected official passages, not certification of the full documents or investment advice. Source links and physical-page references make those boundaries visible.
Financial sections should change when new results are released; project stages, ownership and material corporate events should change when corresponding disclosures appear. Corporate contacts merit a monthly check and the full profile a quarterly review. Unchanged text need not be republished. Future updates should retain the historical quarterly article rather than silently change its period or figures.
S5 · Reports and Company AnnouncementOriginal Dubaist profile based on selected official sources; not an audit or investment recommendation. Financial periods, ownership dates and project stages remain distinct.
The source-attributed editorial profile is separate from database verification. Missing, stale and conflicting database fields remain disclosed below; they do not describe the completeness of this article.
Deyaar Development · What the issuer can provide
Coverage follows a reconciled listed-security identity and dated evidence. Inclusion describes research scope only; it is not a ranking, recommendation or claim of complete financial coverage.
Open a card to inspect its public evidence. Missing, stale, conflicting or unavailable data is never replaced with an estimate.
Identity-only public coverage; no completed research review is claimed.Revalidation is due; the dated record is not proof of current listing status.
Checked: 2026-08-11→AvailableVerified public issuer fields are available.
→Available3 source documents are linked to public facts.
→MissingNo linked activity currently passes every public source-document check.
→AvailableA rights-reviewed official identity source is linked.
→The fields below come from the current public company registry and any human-published issuer profile. Empty issuer-contact fields stay visibly missing until source and publication-rights review are complete.
Only exact-security, human-published activity that passes every public source-document check can appear here.
No linked update currently passes every public gate.
Open the full chronologyRequired identity fields are shown individually with their evidence state. A public link is not reuse permission, and a blank is never converted to a guess.
Deyaar Development
DEYAAR
DFM · XDFM
AED001001018
Listed equity
Real estate · Dubai property development, property/facility/community management and hospitality
Primary active route confirmed
Not available in the public evidence layer
Not available in the public evidence layer
Not available in the public evidence layer
Not available in the public evidence layer
Not available in the public evidence layer
Not available in the public evidence layer
An editorial company profile is published below. It is separate from database-verified fields; source dates and limitations remain attached to the article.
Read the company profileDubai-focused developer that launches, constructs and sells residential/mixed-use projects and recognises most sales revenue over construction progress; also earns smaller recurring revenue from property, facilities and community management, leasing and hospitality. Economics depend on presales, backlog, customer collections, escrow release, construction progress, handovers, cost control, land monetisation, recurring-income KPIs and accessible liquidity.
DFM · DEYAAR
Developer combined with property, community, facilities and asset-management services.
Development is combined with property, community, facilities and asset-management services.
Jannat · Regalia · Millennium Talia Residences
Downtown Residences · AYA Beachfront Residences
Property management · community management · facilities management · asset management
Development contracts generate project revenue while property, community, facilities and asset-management operations can generate service income. Their margins and cash cycles should not be blended without segment evidence.
Use this route to inspect the issuer or listing evidence. A public link is not permission for automated collection.
Open official route ↗Original source-linked explanation of the issuer's operating position within the sector.
Open the 16-company sector studyOnly individually verified values with document provenance can appear in the financial section.
Review the financial evidence stateAn editorial company profile is published below. It is separate from database-verified fields; source dates and limitations remain attached to the article.
Read the company profileThe metrics below define the correct analytical lens for this business model. They contain no company values: a value appears only after official-document provenance and editorial verification.
Only exact-security activity that passes the automatic source, locator, date and localization gates is shown. Exceptions remain unpublished. Each date keeps its lifecycle meaning.
No linked activity currently passes every public source-document check.
This company appears in the dated public collections below. Membership describes coverage and evidence context; it is not a ranking or recommendation.
Public profiles with canonical exchange DFM.
Public profiles assigned to this evidence framework; this is not a ranking.
A source-linked map of 16 listed property companies and REITs, organized by operating model rather than market performance.
Public profiles with a complete source-linked review currently visible to every reader.
Dated public identity checks earlier than 18 August 2026; this does not assert current listing status.
Open this company's free source-linked fundamental-review preview or compare coverage packs and ongoing monitoring. Coverage is not an investment ranking.